The Impact of Race on Sentencing within the US Criminal Justice System Essay

The Impact of Race on Sentencing within the US Criminal Justice System - Essay Example For, within the fine lines of Blind Justice for all, justice is not the same when applied to both the Whites and the Colored residents of the United States. Definitely, justice theoretically must be delivered by the foundations of the justice system. It is said that the complexity of modern life has left the American society with different forms of sociological experiences. This experiences include the uncertainties as well as the certainties of life. The society today often causes irrational behavior among the members of society even to the point making them violate the law. Also, the absence of trust in society creates disintegration of a persons' sense of self and community. In this regard, White racist practices sometimes create an erosion of this trust that the colored members of American society are dying to receive after many years of slavery. This article shows that many of the evidences to pin down the colored people when they are given their day in court are fabricated. In one incident, Javier Ovando of Southern California had a legal battle with the Rampart Division of the LAPD. Javier was released from when only after one of the police officers, Rafael Perez, who arrested him admitted that they had shot Javier several times and admittedly planted a gun on him to seal the case. LAPD Rafael Perez and his fellow officers lied in court and said that he had attacked them with his gun and that the police officers had to fire back in defense. To reiterate, the story of the Rodney King, Tyisha Miller, Amadou Diallo, Javier Ovando, Robert Schenck and many other colored peoples in the United States can be termed 'markers' of the possibility of the colored people to fly to 'freedom from racism' is hampered by the white racist attitudes.In another case, ther Ruth Marcu, "Supreme Court Overturns Law Barring Hate Crimes', Washington Post, June 23, 1992, The American Civil Liberties Union had won its case to engage in cross burnings. For the U.S. Supreme Court decision was that these burning acts are part of the First Amendment benefits. The court here gave impunity to one WHITE teenager to burn a cross on lawn owned by a African American (Feagin, Vera & Batur, 2001, p. 150). In the article Jury Sentencing in Noncapital Cases, An Idea Whose Time has Come (Again) The authors there is a disparity in the sentencing in the United States. Many critics of the 1970s American justice system were disheartened at the wide margin in terms of implementing court decisions as well as the sentencing when both information were compared using the Whites and the colored people as the variables for the research. The judges then were so racially biased in terms of imposing punishment. The application of fixed sentences had been hoped be level the playing field in terms of sentencing between the Whites and